Main article

Nguyen Thi Hong Van
Faculty of Forest Economics, Vietnam National University of Forestry, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
Tran Van Minh
Faculty of Economics and Rural Development, Thai Nguyen University of Agriculture and Forestry, Thai Nguyen 250000, Vietnam
Le Thanh Ha*
Faculty of Agriculture and Rural Development, Hue University of Agriculture and Forestry, Hue 530000, Vietnam
l.thanhha@huaf.edu.vn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63646/trtee.2024.020301

Abstract

Practical education has become a strategic pillar of higher-education reform in agriculture–forestry management programmes, but its performance is poorly captured by examination-style metrics alone. This article develops a multi-dimensional performance appraisal framework that integrates curriculum design, teaching process quality, instructor competence, and practice-base environment, and applies it to three Vietnamese second-tier agricultural and forestry universities. Drawing on questionnaire data from 310 final-year undergraduates and 47 faculty members, the analysis combines the analytic hierarchy process with a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation procedure to derive both global indicator weights and composite performance scores. The findings show that instructor pedagogy, time design, and theory-to-practice integration carry the largest marginal effect on overall programme performance, while practice-base environment, although weighted lower, is the dimension most strongly associated with student-reported rural-service readiness. Subgroup analysis indicates that programmes embedded in extension and field-station networks outperform classroom-centred programmes by a statistically meaningful margin on practical-skill and innovation indicators, even when baseline cohort characteristics are comparable. Sensitivity analysis confirms that the proposed appraisal score is robust to ten-per-cent weight perturbations, with rank-order preservation across the three sample institutions. The article concludes that practical-education appraisal should be designed as a continuous, stakeholder-informed governance instrument rather than an annual audit, and proposes a set of optimization pathways linking appraisal results to curriculum revision, instructor development, partnership cultivation with rural cooperatives, and alignment with national rural revitalization objectives.


 

Article details

How to Cite

Hong Van, N. T., Minh, T. V., & Ha, L. T. (2024). Performance Appraisal of Practical Education in Agriculture–Forestry Management Programs: A Framework for Talent Development and Rural Revitalization. Trends and Reviews of Technological Engineering in Education, 2(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.63646/trtee.2024.020301